Table of Contents
排名机构介绍
官方网站:https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/rankings
USNEWS是U.S. NEWS & World Report的简写,中文名为美国新闻与世界报道,曾是一本与《时代》和《新闻周刊》齐名的新闻杂志,现在专注于为学生提供高等教育信息。
2014年,USNEWS推出世界大学排名,涵盖49个国家,覆盖多个专业领域。
一则八卦, 东北大学在1996年USNEWS的排名中位列162,新上任的校长为了提升排名,成立了专门的研究小组分析USNEWS排名,通过招聘更多老师来降低师生比、提高国际生比例用全额学费增加财政收入等多种有效举措提升排名。到2013年,东北大学蹿升到了第19位,前进了一百多位,成为美国大学排名历史上提升最快的学校。
官方网站: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings
《QS世界大学排名》(英文:QS World University Rankings)为英国一家私人公司Quacquarelli Symonds所发表的年度大学排行榜。QS公司最初与《泰晤士高等教育》增刊合作,两者于2004-2009年期间联合发表《泰晤士高等教育-QS世界大学排名》。2010年后,QS公司以固有的方式继续公布自家的排行榜,泰晤士则采用新的方法,并自行推出《泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名》。目前,QS公司与爱思唯尔合作发布排名,榜单涵盖世界综合与学科,另有亚洲、新兴欧洲与中亚地区、拉丁美洲、阿拉伯地区、金砖五国共五个持不同准则的地区排名。
由于学术声誉是QS的重点指标,并且收集方式过于集中在欧洲,常遭人诟病。
官方网站:https://www.timeshighereducation.com/cn/world-university-rankings/2020/world-ranking?site=cn#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
《泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名》(英文:Times Higher Education World University Rankings)为一私人机构所发行之《泰晤士高等教育》周刊所为之世界大学排名。此周刊原本与QS公司合作,于2004-2009年期间联合推出《泰晤士高等教育-QS世界大学排名》,后于2010年拆伙,改与路透社及近期的爱思唯尔合作发表排名。发展至今,此排行榜囊括了世界综合、学科、声誉,以及亚洲及金砖五国两个地区性榜单。
泰晤士高等教育的排名方法主要是在QS排名的基础上作了一些优化调整。将原先QS排名的六个指标扩展细分成了十三项二级指标,并调整了各自的比重。
官方网站:http://www.shanghairanking.com/index.html
《世界大学学术排名》,简称“上海排名”,为上海软科教育信息咨询有限公司所发表的年度世界大学排名[1]。此排行榜原先由上海交通大学高等教育研究院的世界一流大学研究中心编制及发表[注 1],于2003年首次对外公布,是第一个多指标的全球性大学调查[2],后在学者的帮助下完善[3][4]。
发展至今,此排名囊括了世界性综合及学科榜单,后也添加了独立的地区性《两岸四地大学排名》及《马其顿高校排名》。
ARWU的硬伤在于过多依赖于国际奖项,重理工及研究轻人文及教学素质,如果要选择偏人文的大学就没有太多参考价值。
官方网站:https://www.risk.net/quantitative-finance/7719436/quant-finance-masters-guide-2021
Risk.net发布全球定量分析硕士课程指南,对全球金融工程类学科的专业级进行排名。
官方网站:https://quantnet.com/mfe-programs-rankings/
QuantNet是金融工程MFE专业的权威排名网站,发布全美金融工程专业排名。
看完上文的排名解析会发现,这些排名的考量重点和权重各不相同。那对我们择校来说,需要更为有针对性的进行分析,你更在乎的因素是什么?学校环境还是专业还是就业前景?推荐来英国的小伙伴们按如下步骤在各大官网自行搜索。
Step1:查看综合排名,比如ARWU更学术,Times更综合;
Step2:查看学科排名:
比如商科、金融计算机类的同学可以查看QuantNet(全美排名),Risk.net (全球排名);
QS、TIMES学科排名;
Step3:英国地区排名可以参考卫报、CUG;
Step4:英国地区薪水排名可以参考Glassdoor、Indeed;
TIMES英国排名 2011 to 2021 详细图表
官方网站:https://www.timeshighereducation.com/cn/world-university-rankings/2020/world-ranking?site=cn#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
《泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名》(英文:Times Higher Education World University Rankings)为一私人机构所发行之《泰晤士高等教育》周刊所为之世界大学排名。此周刊原本与QS公司合作,于2004-2009年期间联合推出《泰晤士高等教育-QS世界大学排名》,后于2010年拆伙,改与路透社及近期的爱思唯尔合作发表排名。发展至今,此排行榜囊括了世界综合、学科、声誉,以及亚洲及金砖五国两个地区性榜单。
泰晤士高等教育的排名方法主要是在QS排名的基础上作了一些优化调整。将原先QS排名的六个指标扩展细分成了十三项二级指标,并调整了各自的比重。
Industry Income
Mostly relevant for science, engineering, business and technology subjects, this factor is increasingly becoming a priority for universities and students. It indicates the commercial impact of an institution’s research, which is itself a reflection of the industrial value of the research.
The industry income indicator is of fundamental importance if you prioritise the real-world application of the science and technology research.
For any student and any subject, the most directly relevant factor is the teaching environment: what it is like to learn at the university.
The rankings are based on a strong belief that the quality of teaching at a university is itself predicated on the quality of its research: knowledge production and knowledge transfer at the university.
For this reason, the Teaching metric is measured by five performance indicators: a reputation survey, the ratio of staff to students, the ratio of doctorate students to undergraduate students, the number of doctorates awarded per academic staff, and institutional income.
These give a good indication of the prestige, facilities and resources of the teaching environment, all of which would have a direct impact on you, the student.
The ultimate test of the quality of research is its impact, for all research aims to be influential and important.
In the rankings, the research influence of a university is measured by the number of times that work by an academic at that university is cited by another scholar.
The effect of research influence on your university experience is similar to the effect of research quality. The greater the number of citations of a university’s work, the more likely that you will engage with scholars who are leading and expanding the discussions in the field.
Put more romantically, research impact is a reflection of how much an institution contributes to the worldwide project for collective and collaborative understanding of the world. This contribution is a both a measure of quality at a university, and a source of pride for both academics and students.
Universities are no longer compared just with rivals in their own city, or even their own country; world-leading universities are competing globally and attracting students and researchers from across the world.
International outlook is therefore a mark of a top institution, relevant both to international and domestic students.
It is measured by three indicators: international to domestic student ratio, international to domestic staff ratio, and the proportion of research that involves international collaboration.
The benefits of an international environment on campus range from cultivating open-minded discussions with diverse opinions to improving cross-cultural relations.
But at a more basic level, an isolated institution without international connections simply cannot count itself among the world’s best universities in an increasingly global and mobile world.
wdt_ID | Ranking Year | UK Rank | World Rank | Name | No. of FTE Students | No. of students per staff | International Students | Male Ratio | Female Ratio | Overall | Teaching | Research | Citations | Industry Income | International Outlook |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2021 | 1 | 1 | University of Oxford | 20,774 | 11.1 | 41.0 | 46 | 54 | 95.6 | 91.3 | 99.6 | 98.0 | 68.7 | 96.4 |
2 | 2021 | 2 | 6 | University of Cambridge | 19,370 | 11.0 | 38.0 | 47 | 53 | 94.0 | 90.3 | 99.2 | 95.6 | 52.1 | 95.7 |
3 | 2021 | 3 | 11 | Imperial College London | 17,176 | 11.6 | 58.0 | 39 | 61 | 89.4 | 82.3 | 88.2 | 97.2 | 69.6 | 97.4 |
4 | 2021 | 4 | 16 | UCL | 34,590 | 10.8 | 55.0 | 57 | 43 | 86.9 | 76.6 | 89.4 | 96.2 | 42.1 | 96.5 |
5 | 2021 | 5 | 27 | London School of Economics and Political Science | 10,660 | 12.0 | 72.0 | 54 | 46 | 81.4 | 68.5 | 82.5 | 94.3 | 34.1 | 92.8 |
6 | 2021 | 6 | 30 | University of Edinburgh | 30,649 | 12.1 | 42.0 | 60 | 40 | 79.4 | 67.2 | 74.7 | 96.0 | 38.7 | 94.6 |
7 | 2021 | 7 | 35 | King’s College London | 27,400 | 12.4 | 46.0 | 62 | 38 | 76.1 | 57.3 | 72.4 | 96.6 | 43.6 | 95.4 |
8 | 2021 | 8 | 51 | University of Manchester | 36,557 | 14.4 | 41.0 | 53 | 47 | 70.9 | 57.1 | 66.5 | 85.6 | 49.2 | 91.7 |
9 | 2021 | 9 | 77 | University of Warwick | 21,777 | 13.3 | 41.0 | 49 | 51 | 65.3 | 46.7 | 53.8 | 90.1 | 41.6 | 94.0 |
10 | 2021 | 10 | 91 | University of Bristol | 22,981 | 14.5 | 28.0 | 55 | 45 | 63.0 | 40.3 | 48.6 | 95.6 | 39.8 | 88.2 |
Ranking Year | UK Rank | World Rank | Name |
TIMES英国排名 逐年趋势图
wdt_ID | Name | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Grand Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aberystwyth University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | Anglia Ruskin University ARU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | Aston University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | Bangor University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | Birkbeck, University of London | 152 | 149 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 501 |
6 | Birmingham City University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,001 | 0 | 0 | 1,001 |
7 | Bournemouth University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | Brighton and Sussex Medical School | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Brunel University London | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | Canterbury Christ Church University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,001 | 1,001 | 1,001 | 3,003 |
Name | 2021 |
QS RANKING
wdt_ID | Rank | University | Location | City | Country | Year | Overall Score | Academic Reputation | Citations per Faculty | Employer Reputation | Faculty Student | International Faculty | International Students |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | Cambridge,United States | Cambridge | United States | 2020 | 100.0 | 94.1 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 99.8 | 100 | 100 |
2 | 2 | Stanford University | Stanford,United States | Stanford | United States | 2020 | 98.4 | 67.7 | 99.8 | 100.0 | 98.6 | 100 | 100 |
3 | 3 | Harvard University | Cambridge,United States | Cambridge | United States | 2020 | 97.4 | 62.2 | 86.3 | 98.7 | 99.6 | 100 | 100 |
4 | 4 | University of Oxford | Oxford,United Kingdom | Oxford | United Kingdom | 2020 | 97.2 | 98.5 | 99.7 | 100.0 | 84.7 | 100 | 100 |
5 | 5 | California Institute of Technology (Caltech) | Pasadena,United States | Pasadena | United States | 2020 | 96.9 | 87.3 | 99.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 98 | 81 |
6 | 6 | ETH Zurich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology | Zürich,Switzerland | Zürich | Switzerland | 2020 | 95.9 | 98.0 | 100.0 | 85.0 | 98.4 | 98 | 97 |
7 | 7 | University of Cambridge | Cambridge,United Kingdom | Cambridge | United Kingdom | 2020 | 95.0 | 97.6 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 74.2 | 100 | 100 |
8 | 8 | UCL | London,United Kingdom | London | United Kingdom | 2020 | 94.8 | 100.0 | 99.1 | 98.1 | 76.7 | 99 | 99 |
9 | 9 | Imperial College London | London,United Kingdom | London | United Kingdom | 2020 | 94.1 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 99.8 | 72.1 | 99 | 100 |
10 | 10 | University of Chicago | Chicago,United States | Chicago | United States | 2020 | 92.0 | 81.0 | 70.2 | 96.5 | 78.5 | 100 | 94 |
Rank | University | Country | Year | ||||||||||
Avg = 5.5 | |||||||||||||
Min = 1 | |||||||||||||
heyizhou 10 |